Skip to content

Liability in case of company in liquidation.

Section 88(1)

When any company is being wound up whether under the orders of a court or Tribunal or otherwise, every person appointed as receiver of any assets of a company (hereafter in this section referred to as the "liquidator"), shall, within thirty days after his appointment, give intimation of his appointment to the Commissioner.

AI Explanation

In the context of a company winding up, whether initiated by a court, tribunal, or through other means, a person appointed as the liquidator is mandated by Section 88(1) to fulfill certain duties. This person, referred to as the "liquidator," must, within thirty days of their appointment, inform the Commissioner about their new role.

Key Point: The Liquidator's Role The term "liquidator" refers to the individual responsible for managing and overseeing the assets of a company during the liquidation process. Their primary duty is to handle the winding-up proceedings and ensure that all relevant parties are duly informed.

Reporting Requirement One crucial aspect of the liquidator's responsibilities, as per Section 88(1), is the timely notification to the Commissioner. This notification must occur within thirty days from the date of the liquidator's appointment. It serves as a formal intimation to the regulatory authority, keeping them informed about the ongoing liquidation process.

Importance of Timely Intimation The stipulated thirty-day timeframe emphasizes the significance of promptly communicating the liquidator's appointment. This ensures that regulatory bodies are aware of the changes in the company's status and can take appropriate actions as needed.

Conclusion In navigating the complexities of company liquidation, adherence to legal requirements, such as those outlined in Section 88(1), is crucial. The prompt intimation to the Commissioner stands as a fundamental step in fulfilling the duties of a liquidator and maintaining transparency in the winding-up process.

Section 88(2)

The Commissioner shall, after making such inquiry or calling for such information as he may deem fit, notify the liquidator within three months from the date on which he receives intimation of the appointment of the liquidator, the amount which in the opinion of the Commissioner would be sufficient to provide for any tax, interest or penalty which is then, or is likely thereafter to become, payable by the company.

AI Explanation

When a company enters the process of liquidation, there are certain legal considerations regarding its financial responsibilities. Section 88(2) outlines the role of the Commissioner and the steps to be taken in this context.

Commissioner's Inquiry The Commissioner is responsible for conducting an inquiry into the financial affairs of the company in liquidation. This involves gathering necessary information to assess the company's tax, interest, or penalty obligations.

Notification to the Liquidator Within three months of receiving information about the appointment of the liquidator, the Commissioner must notify the liquidator. This notification includes the amount deemed sufficient by the Commissioner to cover any existing or potential future tax, interest, or penalty payments owed by the company.

In simple terms, Section 88(2) ensures that during the liquidation process, there is a clear communication channel between the Commissioner and the liquidator regarding the company's financial liabilities. This helps in addressing any outstanding tax or penalty issues, providing a structured approach to settling financial obligations.

Section 88(3)

When any private company is wound up and any tax, interest or penalty determined under this Act on the company for any period, whether before or in the course of or after its liquidation, cannot be recovered, then every person who was a director of such company at any time during the period for which the tax was due shall, jointly and severally, be liable for the payment of such tax, interest or penalty, unless he proves to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that such non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part in relation to the affairs of the company.

AI Explanation

When a private company goes through the process of being wound up, there are legal implications for those involved, especially the directors. Section 88(3) outlines the responsibility of directors regarding tax, interest, or penalties determined under the relevant Act for any period—whether before, during, or after liquidation.

Director's Liability In such cases, if the tax, interest, or penalty cannot be recovered, every person who served as a director during the period for which the tax was due becomes jointly and severally liable for payment. This means that each director is responsible for the full amount, unless they can prove to the Commissioner that the non-recovery is not a result of gross neglect, misfeasance, or breach of duty on their part in relation to the company's affairs.

Burden of Proof Directors have the opportunity to avoid liability by demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the failure to recover the amount owed cannot be attributed to any negligence, misconduct, or breach of duty on their part. This provision emphasizes the importance of directors fulfilling their responsibilities diligently to avoid legal repercussions in the event of company liquidation.

In essence, Section 88(3) serves as a safeguard to ensure that individuals who were responsible for the company's affairs are held accountable for outstanding financial obligations, unless they can prove that their actions were not a contributing factor to the inability to recover the owed amounts.